Search for: All records

A significant body of research is dedicated to developing language models that can detect various types of online abuse, for example, hate speech, cyberbullying. However, there is a disconnect between platform policies, which often consider the author's intention as a criterion for content moderation, and the current capabilities of detection models, which typically lack efforts to capture intent. This paper examines the role of intent in the moderation of abusive content. Specifically, we review state-of-the-art detection models and benchmark training datasets to assess their ability to capture intent. We propose changes to the design and development of automated detection and moderation systems to improve alignment with ethical and policy conceptualizations of these abuses. 

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other recent privacy laws require organizations to post their privacy policies, and place specific expectations on organisations' privacy practices. Privacy policies take the form of documents written in natural language, and one of the expectations placed upon them is that they remain up to date. To investigate legal compliance with this recency requirement at a large scale, we create a novel pipeline that includes crawling, regex-based extraction, candidate date classification and date object creation to extract updated and effective dates from privacy policies written in English. We then analyze patterns in policy dates using four web crawls and find that only about 40% of privacy policies online contain a date, thereby making it difficult to assess their regulatory compliance. We also find that updates in privacy policies are temporally concentrated around passage of laws regulating digital privacy (such as the GDPR), and that more popular domains are more likely to have policy dates as well as more likely to update their policies regularly.